Beach Haven

I continue to work in Washington DC, and trek back and forth to GA. When spending a weekend in DC, I attend church at the Aquia Ward in VA. When I’m not in GA, I stay on our boat that we keep in a marina on the Chesapeake Bay. The commute into DC takes about the same amount of time as it did from our home in Stafford, VA.

Last year, I had an assignment to speak at the Twin Oaks ward, discussing the Plan of Salvation. The week before, as I trekked from Solomon’s Island (where the boat is) to attend the Aquia ward, I was thinking about all the change in life, and how it relates to the Plan of Salvation. My basic conclusion is that the Plan of Salvation is the definition of change.

Change can be positive or negative. Change implies a shift in direction, scale, or both. For change to be considered positive or negative depends on the relationship between where you are and what your goal is. You may remember the concept of a vector from your high school geometry class. Words like positive, progress, improvement, etc. all imply that a change, a difference, a delta, is taking you closer to your ultimate goal. Words like negative, destructive, variant, etc. imply change is pointing you toward some place different than your goal. What makes the difference between positive and negative is what your stated goal is.

Heavenly Father’s goal for us is to learn to become as he is. You know, “For this is my work and my glory…”. Part of that process is for us to experience and learn through that experience. Learning only helps if the result is a changed trajectory that takes us closer to His goal for us. Our goal should be the same as His. If we change our goal either deliberately, or through our little choices every day, the resultant change is negative from Heavenly Father’s perspective. Positive change is good in that it draws us closer to His goal by aligning our goal and actions to His.

In the pre-earth life we progressed (changed) through choices and learning, but without a body we could only go so far. Here in mortality, we continue the process through choices that include repentance, gaining the covenant path, then continuing along that path. If the goal is to become like Heavenly Father, and we were not fully that way as spirits (no physical body for example) then change was a must. If we are not like Him here, then change is still a must. Another word for positive change could be ‘growth’. If we are to grow to become as He is then change must be continuous until we reach that goal. The changes required of us are defined in the plan of salvation to include faith in Jesus Christ, repentance, baptism, receiving the gift of the Holy Ghost, and enduring as we continue along the covenant path. This is how I have come to consider the plan of salvation as the plan exaltation, or the plan of change, or the plan of growth. The covenant path then, is a part of the longer path of exaltation.

I don’t know if that makes any sense, but it’s how I’ve come to think about the role of constructive change from a gospel perspective. I’m sure you will have even better ways to understand the plan and our part in it.
​

I serve on the board of the North American Broadcasters Association (NABA). It’s an industry group that addresses international government policies that relate to television and radio broadcasters. The board meetings are often in NYC at the headquarters of NBC at ’30 Rock’. I’ve been there many times before for similar efforts. When I travel between DC and NYC the train is my preferred way to go. It’s just as fast as going through airports, and it gets me closer to where I’m going in Manhattan. It’s also much cheaper. Since the train offers Wi-Fi, I can be productive as well. On one of those trips last year I decided not to concentrate so much on work and took some time for pondering. What follows is not new, nor profound, but is a sketch of where my thoughts led that day.

​Many years ago, I saw an amusing note on a gas-station bathroom wall in Wyoming. It said something like, “The bottoms of our septic tanks are higher than the top of the tallest building in Denver.” Having lived in Leadville, CO in years past, I could appreciate the sentiment. My mind then recalled when our children were young, and we visited Mount Rushmore. Up close it is very impressive. As we left the site, we stopped at a roadside lookout a few miles away. From that distance the carvings seemed quite small in comparison with all the mountains and largess of the surrounding nature-scenes as a whole. In essence, on the train to NYC my thoughts revolved around perspective.

Immediate demands for one’s attention are at times necessary, such as earning a living. When those demands are less necessary they seem fleeting, such as checking on the number of ‘likes’ on a recent post. What about long-term focus? These attention-demanders can help us grow. The risk is they can become too worldly. Examples include exercise for better health or financial management for stability later in life. Not bad. Maybe even important. Yet, again, do we think long-term about worldly issues only?

What about an eternal focus? Does it cause us to ‘forget’ the things of this life? I would argue that eternal perspective makes our insights on the other two foci (immediate and long-term) more truthful. If we manage to have an eternal perspective, at least occasionally, our immediate demands might also include daily spiritual efforts like living the commandments, reading scriptures, and praying. You know, the ‘primary answers’. In terms of making our long-term investment of time more truthful, an eternal perspective might entice us to consider more effort with family history, attending the temple, fulfilling and magnifying our church callings, or finding ways to offer service. In my train-thoughts I was equating eternal perspective with the idea of being 'in the world but not of the world'.

I think maybe the immediate and long-term life demands are about the ‘what’, while having eternal perspective might be more about the ‘why’. Both the ‘what’ and the ‘why’ can be summed up in the two great commandments to love God and our neighbor.

My first introduction to the idea of perspective that I can actually remember came from a song and cartoon on Sesame Street. It was called “That’s About the Size”. The song is all about our physical perspective in relation to physical objects. It can equally apply to our philosophical perspective in relation to ideological subjects.

Here is the link to the Sesame Street song from all those years ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ABxl46Ovv8
​